Date: 10th December 2017 at 2:52pm
Written by:

Birmingham City remain in the bottom three after another defeat on the road, losing 1-0 at Fulham yesterday.

The fixture at Craven Cottage marked Steve Cotterill’s tenth game in charge. In that time, Blues have picked up eight points, scored three goals and conceded 11.

In comparison, Harry Redknapp’s nine games at the helm this season saw Blues conjure up just four points, scoring four goals and conceding 12 goals.

The three games Lee Carsley took temporary charge of produced four points, three goals but saw seven conceded.

On paper, Cotterill’s record doesn’t look too bad. It’s easy to forget that his entire squad has been signed by other managers. Compared to his predecessor, Redknapp, he has organised the defence better.

A worry about Cotterill is the lack of goals his teams score. His system sets up to avoid defeat rather than to win. Even though the goals scored column under Redknapp wasn’t healthy, Blues were always a team who looked as if they could score and given time, there was always a sense that he could turn it around.

So, is Cotterill the right man for Blues? Should he stay or go? Below, I give my thoughts on certain areas of his management.


Looking at Cotterill’s management past, his is very much a reactive manager who plays things very safe. Since he took chrage of Blues, he has tried to build the team from the back.

In order to do this successfully, the team needs to be a threat on the break – Blues aren’t.

Sometimes, Cotterill could be a little more adventurous with his selections. You may as well attack and lose than sit back and lose, which is what Blues are doing currently.


This is the one area that has undoubtedly improved under Cotterill. The organisation is better and Blues appear harder to break down.

Having said that, they do still have a soft underbelly and are prone to conceding an early goal which gives them a mountain to climb.

The hope is that Cotterill can get a settled defence and then start mastering the others areas on the pitch.


Absolutely toothless. The midfield seem incapable of creating anything for the strikers and the strikers seem incapable of taking the rare chances that fall their way.

I can understand why Cotterill often opts for workmanlike players but leaving the likes of Jeremie Boga out until recently, and now Jota, indicates a manager leaving the shackles on.

While Jota has hardly pulled up tress since joining from Brentford for a club record fee, it is difficult for him to thrive in a team set-up in the way Cotterill sets Blues up.

It will be interesting to see who Cotterill signs in January, assuming he is still in charge.


This area is my main criticism of Cotterill. Watch any Blues game, especially a defeat, then listen to his post match interview.

I’ve said on this website previously that I’m not sure he’s watched the same game as me. Apparently we deserved a point against Wolves despite not producing a single shot on target.

And what’s with the waffling? A couple of weeks back, BBC WM had to cut him off mid-interview because he was taking an age to answer every question.

Cotterill isn’t the most popular manager ever to arrive at B9. And while most fans understand the job he has undertaken is a difficult one, the little things he does can really grate.

His failure to acknowledge fans after the defeat at Fulham yesterday was the final straw for some. A bit premature maybe, but the boss really doesn’t help himself.


To summarise, Cotterill isn’t doing any worse than his two predecessors. But the reason they are no longer at the club is because they weren’t performing well enough.

To keep his job, Cotterill must oversee a drastic upturn in fortunes. That is very difficult to see at present.

Redknapp was sacked. Is Cotterill doing any better? I’d be reluctant to say yes. The next two games could decide what happens going forward.

Follow me on Twitter @wildey986

Click for the forum

7 Replies to “Should Steve Cotterill stay or go?”

  • Most important issue is whether a change of manager will give us a better chance of staying up.My own opinion is that we would stand a better chance.Anybody with any footballing nous would have very little hesitation in feeling the same.


  • Gotta go. He is seriously out of his depth. He will relegate us. Get someone in before it is too late. I’d say someone like Pulis or Pearson or even an up and coming manager like Shrewsburys who took them from the bottom of the league to top of the league playing good football.

  • Just watched the video just released by the Evening Mail regarding the tense post match exchange with the fans.What a shambles of a club we now are.Me now finished after that fiasco.

  • Ohio. I have felt like that ever since HR was sacked and SC appointed. I was dubious from the beginning of SC’s time because of his CV and I haven’t seen anything to change my mind. His tactics and after game analysis scream ‘lower league manager’. Mr Wildey has certainly done his homework, displaying the stats of HR and SC, and rightly makes the point of SC defense being better. However, what he hasn’t highlighted is that SC is working with the defensive players HR brought in but didn’t have time to work with. This is not an article criticism, merely an observation which makes me wonder, what would HR goals against column be like now if he was still in the post? For two reasons, the most interesting part of this blog post for me was “Even though the goals scored column under Redknapp wasn’t healthy, Blues were always a team who looked as if they could score and given time, there was always a sense that he could turn it around”. Firstly I agree wholeheartedly and everything I have written on previous posts in defense of HR is from that ‘sense’ he was more than capable of turning it around. There was enough in some of the performances in his short time to keep that belief (sense) alive in me. Secondly under SC i don’t have any optimism whatsoever; which has attributed to a real disconnect from the club for the first time in almost 40 years. I can’t help thinking the decision to sack HR so soon after 14 new players coming in is going to take us years to recover from. And in summary just like Ohio, i’m done.

  • It isnt very watchable simply because we don’t have the players capable of entertaining unless they are going flat out on the attack. Its no different to how Rowett worked with players of much the same levels of ability. The difference for Rowett was he had players who could hit on the break and instilled confidence in them which in turn scraped us some results. It wasn’t pretty but it was effective. We followed this with two managers who thought they could tun Blues into a good footballing team overnight, and now have a manager who recognises this isn’t possible with what he has been left with.
    Not an easy job but I hear the money is good and the compensation is really good’ but I really do believe that Steve wants to do well at Blues and he will give 110% to try and make it work.

Comments are closed.